The pillars of Islam are fundamental aspects of the religion. However, Syrian philosopher and scholar, Muhammad Syahrur, has called into question the concept of these pillars. In this article, we will discuss Syahrur's views on the pillars of Islam and their implications.



The author begins by stating that the pillars of Islam are based on two hadiths agreed upon by Sunni scholars. However, Syahrur argues that the pillars of Islam are not five, but three. This raises questions about other hadiths that mention Islamic principles but have different content from the five pillars. The author wonders if we should acknowledge the existence of more than five pillars of Islam based on these hadiths.


According to Muhammad Syahrur, there are three main principles of Islam: belief in the existence of Allah, belief in the day of judgment, and doing good deeds. Although this idea seems simple, it challenges the traditional view of the pillars of Islam. This implies that the pillars of Islam are not just a set of practices, but a deeper understanding of the essence of Islam.


It is important to note that the purpose of this article is not to confirm Syahrur's views, but to discuss and refute them academically. The author acknowledges that Syahrur's perspective on Islam adds a new dimension to the concept of the pillars of Islam.


In addition, Syahrur's idea of the "pillars of Islam" includes anyone who practices them, regardless of their religious affiliation, including followers of Judaism, Christianity, and other religions. This concept challenges the traditional view that Islam is exclusive only to Muslims. It is an open and inclusive view of Islam that emphasizes the universal principles of religion.


The concept of "bayn al-mu'minin wa al-muslimin" (the agreement between believers and Muslims) in the Medina Charter complements Syahrur's perspective on Islam by distinguishing between believers and Muslims. This agreement emphasizes the importance of unity and cooperation between believers, regardless of their religious affiliation.


However, Syahrur's views leave some unanswered questions. He does not use the terms "kafir" or "non-Muslim" as the opposite of Muslims, so the question that arises is what term he uses. Also, it is unclear what Syahrur's view is on the "pillars of Iman" and what term he uses to distinguish between believers and Muslims.


Overall, Muhammad Syahrur's perspective on the pillars of Islam provides a new dimension to understanding the fundamental principles of religion. Although this view challenges the traditional view of the pillars of Islam, it is important to discuss and refute these ideas academically. Syahrur's inclusive view of Islam emphasizes the universal principles of religion, which is essential for promoting unity and cooperation between believers.